Wednesday, January 6, 2010
North
North is clearly some one who is very passionate about tutoring and helping writers develop better writing skills and improve in literacy all around. In his article he clearly details what he believes the best scenario for a writing center is, and how tutors should go about helping the students who go to them for help. While I agree with his notions that the main focus should be placed on the writer themself rather than the text placed in front of them, I feel as though his ideas are a bit extreme. North rambles on for what seems to be an eternity about the proper way to tutor and what the focus of a tutor in a writing center should be, he even implies that while a tutor could successfully make a paper nearly flawless for the peer seeking help, the tutor can still be a failure, and let down their client. He believes that unless the student leaves the writing center with new ideas about writing and big improvements in their tendencies as a writer altogether. My opinion differs from North's, I believe that while grammatical errors should be cast aside, and the focus should be turned towards structure, form, and expansion of ideas, the student seeking aid is most likely seeking a simple grade boost. Their reason for attending the writing center at all in most cases is simply to achieve a good grade on a tricky paper. I believe a tutor should focus on the paper at hand, but focus on the forementioned aspects rather than grammar, punctuation, and other errors that are specific to only that given paper and do not apply to content.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Melanie, would you say that the tutor's job should be to improve the student's grade based on fixing the form and structure (organization) of the paper while ignoring the grammatical, syntactical and spelling problems? I don't think North would disagree with you there. It is pretty unrealistic to hope that students will go to the writing center simply because they want to make themselves into better writers, and I don't think North fully believes that will happen, frustrated as he may be with that reality.
ReplyDeleteThis is a really good introduction, i think you can expand on this article alot more, You now have set up almost an epic battle between yourself and North. Since blogs tend to be an informal setting, you are able to take some liberties. Throw in the metaphors you enjoy using and expand on North's ideas so you can describe with more authority why you disagree.
ReplyDeleteI think an important idea here is that North, in my opinion, seems to be talking more to the tutor rather than the 'peer seeking help.' Obviously, in most instances students come to the writing centers for better grades rather than to become better writing (especially if they're chemistry majors) but as tutors I don't think North wants us to give-in to that ideology. If the tutor has the attitude that "this student just wants a better grade so I'm not even going to try to make him a better writer" then I think that's when the tutor has truly failed the peer seeking help.
ReplyDeleteI think the key word is "try." Most students will only visit the writing center once or twice, and it would be hard to make the student into a completely better writer in fifty minutes. I know that's obvious, but it's a problem that North addresses. Whether or not the tutor facilitates a productive session is based on the two-way conversation he/she allows to happen.
ReplyDelete